Music + Brands: The Credibility Question

The Credibility Question. If you are at all dialed in to the music + brand partnership space, you no doubt hear and read about it often, whether in blog posts, blog comments or even in the New York Times. Reporters and bloggers cannot let any commentary about a brand’s foray into music slide without a ‘Yeah, but will it be credible?’, said in a variety of ways, depending on whether you are reading or At this point, we totally expect that. We have heard it from the outset, but always laughed it off. Here is the rationale.

I am convinced that any brand diving head first into millions of dollars worth of investment in the music space (ACME-led or not) would expect credibility to be a given. Brand managers – whether sitting at a label managing the release of the new Nas album or at BILLION dollar consumer packaged good brand – understand the underlying need to be credible, if anything at all. So why would either turn off the credibility filter when they join marketing forces? This is why Converse hires Pharrell. Or why Nike and Absolut hire Kanye. And why P&G forged a partnership with Island Def Jam and Jermaine Dupri. All of these parties are so inherently credible when they do what they do, the credibility conversation rarely comes up at all.

Do you think someone went to Pharrell and said “Hey Pharrell. Make a hot song for Converse. Oh, and uh, make sure it’s credible.”

The biggest irony in The Credibility Question is the fact that the consumers are seemingly the ones questioning credibility the least. These music/brand relationships typically serve to add value to their lives and by all indications, brands are delivering for consumers. The TAG Records Myspace profile received just under 1 million views in 2 months. Multiple artists have created original music for the brand – unsolicited. Aspiring artists have dedicated huge portions of there Myspace profiles to TAG Records, and have loudly expressed their dedication to the brand, simply because the brand is listening to them like no other brand/record label has before.

Converse is giving away a free Pharrell song. It happens to be a great song, and now has a great video. Pharrell grabbed a couple of friends, produced a killer track and groundbreaking video, and it would have never seen the light of day without Converse. Yeah, but is it credible? Stupid question.

The first few seconds seem to be all it takes for a consumer to sniff something out, and if any of these deals were suspect, they would have fell flat right out of the gates. Let the music speak for itself. I firmly believe… “If a 40+ year-old, balding, blogger thinks our youth-focused programs aren’t cool, we are probably doing something right!”

And the biggest question of all… what do the skeptical reporters and bloggers consider credible these days anyways? Apple Bottom jeans? Boots with the fur?

2 Responses

  1. Dr. Tantillo (‘the marketing doctor’) recently posted on this from a branding perspective, focusing more on the potential return for the corporations rather than the artists and positing that these partnerships with music could be a boon (Dupri for P&G/TAG) but also a potential liability, since sponsoring a celebrity (or growing one) essentially constitutes an investment in something/someone over which/whom they ultimately don’t have much control:

  2. […] – bookmarked by 6 members originally found by jfeuerstein on 2008-12-23 Music + Brands: The Credibility Question – bookmarked […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: